Some time ago I
attended a speaking event that was on some of the atrocities of the Rwandan
genocide, told from the perspective of a survivor who lost his entire family
during the tragic event. The speaker’s media was effective in the way that it
inspired true emotion and sympathy from the audience. Personally, the images
that were shown both touched and disturbed me, and even brought me to tears
(which is not an easy task). He
used photos and video interviews that he had taken himself that depicted the
pure evil and unimaginable actions perpetrated during the Rwandan Genocide.
Although he effectively inspired emotion in the audience, I did feel that he
relied a bit too much on his presentation media, while under-preparing his
actual oral presentation. Also,
although much of his presentation was very informative and awe-inspiring, it
seemed at some points that he was just kind-of adding filler. I feel that there
was a point where the audience was just a little bit overburdened with the
presentation media. I would suggest that he work more on his oral presentation
and limit his media presentation. Although much of the media was effective, the
sheer volume of it made the information begin to just kind-of blend and lump
together, rather than enhancing individual aspects of the topic. Also I would
suggest that he weed out some of the less significant and impacting images so
as not to take away from the really powerful ones. I think part of the problem
there was that because he was so deeply affected by the tragedy, he focused his
speech more around his own agenda rather than catering to the audience.
I too have attended speeches about genocide in Africa! It is sad that is allowed to go on there. The presentation example I used was a drinking and driver speech. I agree with you that pictures can be too graphic and disturbing, but I believe there is no other way to show what really happens. Words can not always paint a picture of how traumatizing experiences really are. Sometimes showing images is the only way to get a point across, sometimes not. On the other hand, you have to think about the audience and limit how many pictures and restrict some things that can be disturbing to the majority of people.
ReplyDeleteThe point of these though is too extract a huge emotional response from audience to gain support and donations. A logic argument simply doesn't work very well, because then it allows for you to question your support. You would have to compare it against other plights, as well as your own day to day life. However, if you are bombarded with extremely vivid images immediately you have an emotional response and logic starts to disappear.
ReplyDeleteAlso, if your speaker would have tried to use words or explain the emotion could have been lost. "A picture is worth a 1000 words."